Occurrence record: MEL 1582749A

Preserved specimen of Cassinia quinquefaria R.Br. | Rosemary Shrub recorded on 1878

API

Dataset

Data partner	Australia's Virtual Herbarium
Data resource	National Herbarium of Victoria (MEL) AVH data
Institution code	Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria Supplied institution code "MEL"
Collection	National Herbarium of Victoria Supplied collection code "MEL"
Catalog number	MEL 1582749A
Occurrence ID	9ec1f4ea-61c6-4917-af52-58841ccba992
Record type	Preserved specimen Supplied basis "PreservedSpecimen"
Preparations	Sheet
Identified by	Orchard, A.E.
Collector	Woolls, W. Supplied as "Woolls, W."
Record number	s.n.
Reproductive condition	flowers
License	CC-BY 4.0 (Int) Supplied as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Rights holder	Royal Botanic Gardens Board
Type	PhysicalObject
Presence/Absence	PRESENT Supplied as present
Previous identifications	Cassinia quinquefaria R.Br.
Occurrence remarks	[Letter attached to sheet:] My Dear Doctor, I have seen four letters in reference to Cappervis Mitchellii + addintional localities for plants. I have only on of the Capens in my posession + that a small one but I have spoken to a grower who is going to the [?] + be has promised to [?] for me, which I hope some day to forward to you. When I have leisure, I will pay after [?] to the other matter. Will you kindly clear up a little difficulty for me? I was under the impression that we have only the blue Commelyna [=Commelina] (C. cyanea) at Port Jackson. Rather c[?] the only [?] in many damp places in the country of Cumbaland [=Cumberland]. But it appears, that, a the Darling Point Road near by only, the yellow of Sulphur [?] one [?], of which [?dose] specimen. Now is this plant a distinct species, or a mere variety? The plants + their habit are for the most part aline [?] they differ in the colour of the flower, + the length of the pedicels. I think also that one of the petals in the yellow one is smaller that the other too. Is the yellow one Brown's C. lanceolata? Will you kindly give me yout opinion on the subject? I have sent a paragraph to the Herald in reference to [?]'s omission of your name + [?]. I hope the [?] [?] [?] of, perhaps the omission was unintentional, [?] if [?] Sutherlands attention were [?] to the subject, he might do you justice in the next edition of his books. I give Cunningham [?] creditfor what he did, but it is too bad to if [?] your [?]. I think that the plant I forwarded the [?] there day is not Leprosia, but Cladium. With best wishes courtesy[?] W. Woolls. P.S. The Cassinia laevis + C. quinquefaria distinct? *You will see the paragraph in today's Herald. I have [?] seed to [?] of the [?]. .
Date identified	2016-05-10
Identification ID	0b774580-81a8-49a9-b974-6a9dbad7c4c5

Event

Event ID	5890bc3c-9304-4a78-bfed-f560041e6737
Occurrence date	Year: 1878, Month: , Day: Supplied as year:1878
Date precision	YEAR

Taxonomy

Higher classification	Eukarya \| Plantae \| Viridaeplantae \| Tracheophyta \| Magnoliopsida \| Asteranae \| Asterales \| Asteraceae \| Cassinia
Scientific name	Cassinia quinquefaria
Identified to rank	species
Common name	Rosemary Shrub
Kingdom	Plantae
Phylum	Charophyta Supplied as "Tracheophyta"
Class	Equisetopsida Supplied as "Magnoliopsida"
Order	Asterales
Family	Asteraceae
Genus	Cassinia
Species	Cassinia quinquefaria
Name match metric	exactMatch
Scientific name authorship	R.Br.
Name parse type	SCIENTIFIC
Nomenclatural code	ICN

Geospatial

Higher geography	Oceania \| Australia
Country	Australia
State or Territory	New South Wales
Locality	Cumberland.
Verbatim locality	Cumberland.
Terrestrial	false
Continent	OCEANIA Supplied as Oceania
Marine	false
Country Code	AU
Verbatim SRS	1
Location ID	7960df73-3e9c-446a-8314-3a158855898b

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

Test name	Result
Coordinate uncertainty meters invalid	Warning
Location not supplied	Warning
Taxon misapplied matched	Warning
Show/Hide 78 passed properties
Ambiguous collection	Passed
Ambiguous institution	Passed
Basis of record badly formed	Passed
Collection match fuzzy	Passed
Collection not matched	Passed
CONTINENT_COORDINATE_MISMATCH	Passed
Continent country mismatch	Passed
Continent derived from coordinates	Passed
CONTINENT_DERIVED_FROM_COUNTRY	Passed
Continent invalid	Passed
Coordinates centre of country	Passed
Coordinates dont match supplied country	Passed
Country inferred from coordinates	Passed
Country invalid	Passed
Country mismatch	Passed
Different owner institution	Passed
First of the century	Passed
First of the month	Passed
First of the year	Passed
Georeferenced after occurrence date	Passed
Identified date invalid	Passed
Identified date unlikely	Passed
Identification date before occurrence date	Passed
Institution and Collection mismatch	Passed
Institution match fuzzy	Passed
Institution not matched	Passed
Interpretation error	Passed
Invalid scientific name	Passed
Missing collection date	Passed
Missing taxon rank	Passed
Modified date invalid	Passed
Modified date unlikely	Passed
Multimedia date invalid	Passed
Multimedia uri invalid	Passed
Name not supplied	Passed
Occurrence status inferred from basis of record	Passed
Occurrence status inferred from individual count	Passed
Occurrence status unparsable	Passed
Recorded date invalid	Passed
Recorded date mismatch	Passed
Recorded date unlikely	Passed
SCIENTIFIC_NAME_AND_ID_INCONSISTENT	Passed
Sensitivity report invalid	Passed
Sensitivity report not loadable	Passed
Coordinates dont match supplied state	Passed
Taxon affinity species	Passed
TAXON_CONCEPT_ID_NOT_FOUND	Passed
Taxon confer species	Passed
Taxon default match	Passed
Taxon error	Passed
Taxon excluded	Passed
Taxon excluded associated	Passed
Taxon homonym	Passed
Taxon indeterminate species	Passed
Taxon match aggregate	Passed
Taxon match fuzzy	Passed
Taxon match higher rank	Passed
TAXON_MATCH_NAME_AND_ID_AMBIGUOUS	Passed
Taxon match none	Passed
TAXON_MATCH_TAXON_CONCEPT_ID_IGNORED	Passed
Taxon misapplied	Passed
Taxon parent child synonym	Passed
Taxon question species	Passed
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch	Passed
Taxon species plural	Passed
Supplied country not recognised	Passed
Kingdom not recognised	Passed
Unrecognized collection code	Passed
Unrecognized institution code	Passed
Biosecurity issue	Passed
Suspected outlier	Passed
Geospatial issue	Passed
Habitat incorrect for species	Passed
Taxon misidentified	Passed
Taxonomic issue	Passed
Temporal issue	Passed
Other issue	Passed
Duplicate record	Passed
Show/Hide 5 missing properties
Missing georeferenced by	Missing
Missing georeference protocol	Missing
Missing georeference sources	Missing
Missing georeference verification status	Missing
Missing georeference date	Missing
Show/Hide 38 tests that have not been run
Supplied coordinates centre of state	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Uncertainty not specified	Unchecked (lack of data)
Missing geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Supplied coordinates are zero	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates are out of range for species	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate rounded	Unchecked (lack of data)
Unrecognized geodetic datum	Unchecked (lack of data)
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinates converted to WGS84	Unchecked (lack of data)
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate reprojection suspicious	Unchecked (lack of data)
Coordinate precision invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Footprint SRS invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Footprint WKT mismatch	Unchecked (lack of data)
Footprint WKT invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Presumed swapped coordinate	Unchecked (lack of data)
Longitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
Latitude is negated	Unchecked (lack of data)
TAXON_MATCH_SCIENTIFIC_NAME_ID_IGNORED	Unchecked (lack of data)
TAXON_MATCH_TAXON_ID_IGNORED	Unchecked (lack of data)
SCIENTIFIC_NAME_ID_NOT_FOUND	Unchecked (lack of data)
TAXON_ID_NOT_FOUND	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth unlikely	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max depth reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Depth value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Elevation unlikely	Unchecked (lack of data)
Min and max altitude reversed	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value supplied in feet	Unchecked (lack of data)
Altitude value non-numeric	Unchecked (lack of data)
Type status invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
References uri invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Individual count invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)
Individual count conflicts with occurrence status	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced date unlikely	Unchecked (lack of data)
Georeferenced date invalid	Unchecked (lack of data)

AVH

The Australasian Virtual Herbarium

Occurrence record: MEL 1582749A

Dataset

Event

Taxonomy

Geospatial

User flagged issues

Data quality tests

- flagged by


Classification	Scientific name	Cassinia quinquefaria	Cassinia quinquefaria
	Match type		exactMatch
	Phylum id		https://id.biodiversity.org.au/taxon/apni/51744351
	Family id		https://id.biodiversity.org.au/taxon/apni/51744543
	Taxon concept ID		https://id.biodiversity.org.au/node/apni/2910925
	Order	Asterales	Asterales
	Taxon rank id		7000
	Species id		https://id.biodiversity.org.au/node/apni/2910925
	Genus	Cassinia	Cassinia
	Left		626584
	Higher classification	Eukarya \| Plantae \| Viridaeplantae \| Tracheophyta \| Magnoliopsida \| Asteranae \| Asterales \| Asteraceae \| Cassinia
	Scientific name authorship	R.Br.	R.Br.
	Taxon rank	species	species
	Genus id		https://id.biodiversity.org.au/taxon/apni/51742810
	Name type		SCIENTIFIC
	Vernacular name		Rosemary Shrub
	Nomenclatural code	ICN
	Order id		https://id.biodiversity.org.au/taxon/apni/51744544
	Right		626584
	Kingdom	Plantae	Plantae
	Specific epithet	quinquefaria
	Class id		https://id.biodiversity.org.au/taxon/apni/51744350
	Phylum	Tracheophyta	Charophyta
	Class	Magnoliopsida	Equisetopsida
	Species		Cassinia quinquefaria
	Family	Asteraceae	Asteraceae
	Kingdom id		https://id.biodiversity.org.au/taxon/apni/51744352
Event	Event ID	5890bc3c-9304-4a78-bfed-f560041e6737
	Year	1878	1878
	Date precision		YEAR
	Event date	1878
Identification	Date identified	2016-05-10	2016-05-10
	Identified by	[Orchard, A.E.]
	Identification ID	0b774580-81a8-49a9-b974-6a9dbad7c4c5
Occurrence	Rights holder		Royal Botanic Gardens Board
	Type		PhysicalObject
	Catalog number	MEL 1582749A
	Occurrence status	present	PRESENT
	Basis of record	PreservedSpecimen	PRESERVED_SPECIMEN
	Modified	2021-06-16 13:57:59	2021-06-16T13:57:59
	Reproductive condition	flowers
	Record number	s.n.
	Collection code	MEL
	Occurrence ID	9ec1f4ea-61c6-4917-af52-58841ccba992
	Preparations	Sheet
	Institution code	MEL
	Recorded by	Woolls, W.	[Woolls, W.]
	Previous identifications	Cassinia quinquefaria R.Br.
	Occurrence remarks	[Letter attached to sheet:] My Dear Doctor, I have seen four letters in reference to Cappervis Mitchellii + addintional localities for plants. I have only on of the Capens in my posession + that a small one but I have spoken to a grower who is going to the [?] + be has promised to [?] for me, which I hope some day to forward to you. When I have leisure, I will pay after [?] to the other matter. Will you kindly clear up a little difficulty for me? I was under the impression that we have only the blue Commelyna [=Commelina] (C. cyanea) at Port Jackson. Rather c[?] the only [?] in many damp places in the country of Cumbaland [=Cumberland]. But it appears, that, a the Darling Point Road near by only, the yellow of Sulphur [?] one [?], of which [?dose] specimen. Now is this plant a distinct species, or a mere variety? The plants + their habit are for the most part aline [?] they differ in the colour of the flower, + the length of the pedicels. I think also that one of the petals in the yellow one is smaller that the other too. Is the yellow one Brown's C. lanceolata? Will you kindly give me yout opinion on the subject? I have sent a paragraph to the Herald in reference to [?]'s omission of your name + [?]. I hope the [?] [?] [?] of, perhaps the omission was unintentional, [?] if [?] Sutherlands attention were [?] to the subject, he might do you justice in the next edition of his books. I give Cunningham [?] creditfor what he did, but it is too bad to if [?] your [?]. I think that the plant I forwarded the [?] there day is not Leprosia, but Cladium. With best wishes courtesy[?] W. Woolls. P.S. The Cassinia laevis + C. quinquefaria distinct? *You will see the paragraph in today's Herald. I have [?] seed to [?] of the [?]. .
Attribution	Data resource		National Herbarium of Victoria (MEL) AVH data
	Collection		National Herbarium of Victoria
	License	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode	CC-BY 4.0 (Int)
	Data provider uid		dp36
	Provenance		Published dataset
	Data Resource ID	dr376	dr376
	Institution ID		in21
	Data partner		Australia's Virtual Herbarium
	Institution		Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria
	Data hub uid	[dh2, dh9]
	Collection ID		co55
Location	Country	Australia	Australia
	Terrestrial	false	false
	Higher geography	Oceania \| Australia
	Locality	Cumberland.	Cumberland.
	State province	New South Wales	New South Wales
	Verbatim locality	Cumberland.
	Continent	Oceania	OCEANIA
	Marine	false	false
	Country code	AU	AU
	Verbatim SRS	1
	Location ID	7960df73-3e9c-446a-8314-3a158855898b