Occurrence record: HO321826
Dataset
Data provider | Australia's Virtual Herbarium |
Data resource | HO AVH data |
Institution |
Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery
Supplied institution code "HO" |
Collection |
Tasmanian Herbarium
Supplied collection code "HO" |
Catalogue Number | HO321826 |
Basis of record | Preserved specimen |
Preparations | sheet |
Identified by | A.M. Gray |
Identified date | 2002 |
Collector | Jackson, W.D. |
Collecting number | 6 |
License | CC-BY 4.0 (Int) |
Occurrence remarks | No collection date |
Occurrence status | present |
Date identified | 2002 |
Event
Collecting date |
[date not supplied]
Supplied date "0000-00-00" |
Date precision | Not Supplied |
Taxonomy
Scientific name |
Eucalyptus subcrenulata
Supplied scientific name "Eucalyptus subcrenulata Maiden & Blakely" |
Taxon rank | species |
Kingdom | Plantae |
Phylum | Charophyta |
Class | Equisetopsida |
Order | Myrtales |
Family | Myrtaceae |
Genus | Eucalyptus |
Species | Eucalyptus subcrenulata |
Taxonomic issues | No issues |
Name match metric |
Exact match
The supplied name matched the name exactly. |
Name parse type | SCIENTIFIC |
Scientific name authorship | Maiden & Blakely |
Geospatial
Country | Australia |
State or Territory | Tasmania |
Local government area | Kentish (M) |
Locality | Mount Roland |
Latitude |
-41.465285 Supplied as: "-41.466667" |
Longitude |
146.2677 Supplied as: "146.266667" |
Geodetic datum |
EPSG:4326 Supplied datum: "unknown" |
Verbatim locality | Mount Roland |
Minimum elevation in metres | 1230 |
Coordinate precision | 0.016667 |
Coordinate uncertainty in metres | 1000.0 |
Georeferenced by | Tasmanian Herbarium (HO) |
Verbatim SRS | AGM66 |
Biome | Terrestrial |
Country code | AU |
Verbatim elevation | 1230.0 Supplied as 1230 |
Data quality tests
Test name | Result |
Invalid collection date | Failed |
Coordinate precision not valid | Failed |
Incomplete collection date | Warning |
Occurrence status assumed to be present | Warning |
Coordinates converted to WGS84 | Warning |
Basis of record not supplied | Passed |
Basis of record badly formed | Passed |
Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation | Passed |
Missing identification date | Passed |
Collector name unparseable | Passed |
Missing catalogue number | Passed |
Data are generalised | Passed |
Collection code not recognised | Passed |
Institution code not recognised | Passed |
Missing taxonomic rank | Passed |
Name not supplied | Passed |
Name not recognised | Passed |
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch | Passed |
Invalid scientific name | Passed |
Name not in national checklists | Passed |
Decimal coordinates not supplied | Passed |
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84 | Passed |
Unrecognized geodetic datum | Passed |
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed | Passed |
Altitude out of range | Passed |
Altitude value non-numeric | Passed |
Altitude value supplied in feet | Passed |
Coordinates are transposed | Passed |
Coordinates are out of range for species | Passed |
Supplied coordinates are zero | Passed |
Zero latitude | Passed |
Zero longitude | Passed |
Supplied country not recognised | Passed |
Coordinate uncertainty not valid | Passed |
Missing coordinate precision | Passed |
Precision / range mismatch | Passed |
Coordinate uncertainty not specified | Passed |
Location not supplied | Passed |
Country inferred from coordinates | Passed |
Supplied coordinates centre of state | Passed |
Coordinates centre of country | Passed |
Missing geodetic datum | Passed |
Missing name of person who georeferenced the occurrence | Passed |
Coordinates dont match supplied state | Passed |
Habitat incorrect for species | Passed |
Show/Hide 6 missing properties | |
Show/Hide 35 tests that have not been run |