Occurrence record: DNA A0059045
Dataset
Data partner | Australia's Virtual Herbarium |
Data resource | DNA AVH data |
Institution code |
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Supplied institution code "DNA" |
Collection code |
Northern Territory Herbarium (Darwin)
Supplied collection code "DNA" |
Catalog number | DNA A0059045 |
Occurrence ID | DNA:DNA:DNA A0059045 |
Basis of record | Preserved specimen |
Preparations | sheet |
Collector | Beauglehole, A. |
Record number | 54369 |
Reproductive condition | fertile |
Occurrence status | present Supplied as Present |
Event
Occurrence date |
1976-07-06
Supplied date "1976-07-06T00:00:00" |
Date precision | Day |
Taxonomy
Scientific name |
Hibiscus pentaphyllus
Supplied scientific name "Hibiscus pentaphyllus F.Muell." |
Taxon rank | species |
Kingdom | Plantae |
Phylum | Charophyta |
Class | Equisetopsida |
Order | Malvales |
Family | Malvaceae |
Genus | Hibiscus |
Species | Hibiscus pentaphyllus |
Taxonomic issue | No issues |
Name match metric |
Exact match
The supplied name matched the name exactly. |
Name parse type | SCIENTIFIC |
Scientific name authorship | F.Muell. |
Geospatial
Country | Australia |
State or Territory | Western Australia |
Locality | Wyndham-East Kimberley (S) |
Locality | lake argyle, about 68km south south east of kununurra |
Latitude |
-16.2152713119 Supplied as: "-16.2152713124" |
Longitude |
128.851244753 Supplied as: "128.8512447530" |
Geodetic datum |
EPSG:4326 Supplied datum: "GDA94" |
Coordinate precision | Unknown |
Coordinate uncertainty in meters | 900.0 |
Georeference protocol | unknown |
Biome | Terrestrial |
Country code | AU |
Additional properties
Data quality tests
Test name | Result |
Coordinates converted to WGS84 | Warning |
Basis of record not supplied | Passed |
Basis of record badly formed | Passed |
Invalid collection date | Passed |
Incomplete collection date | Passed |
First of the month | Passed |
Collector name unparseable | Passed |
Missing catalogue number | Passed |
Data are generalised | Passed |
Collection code not recognised | Passed |
Institution code not recognised | Passed |
Name not supplied | Passed |
Name not recognised | Passed |
Resource taxonomic scope mismatch | Passed |
Invalid scientific name | Passed |
Name not in national checklists | Passed |
Decimal coordinates not supplied | Passed |
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84 | Passed |
Unrecognized geodetic datum | Passed |
Decimal latitude/longitude conversion failed | Passed |
Coordinates are transposed | Passed |
Coordinates are out of range for species | Passed |
Supplied coordinates are zero | Passed |
Zero latitude | Passed |
Zero longitude | Passed |
Supplied country not recognised | Passed |
Coordinate uncertainty not valid | Passed |
Coordinate uncertainty not specified | Passed |
Location not supplied | Passed |
Country inferred from coordinates | Passed |
Supplied coordinates centre of state | Passed |
Coordinates centre of country | Passed |
Missing geodetic datum | Passed |
Missing georeferenced protocol | Passed |
Coordinates dont match supplied state | Passed |
Habitat incorrect for species | Passed |
Show/Hide 10 missing properties | |
Show/Hide 40 tests that have not been run |